jual condotel mewah

Rp 2.422.000.000

Tempat Rumah Impian Termurah Bogor RumahCantikku.com adalah agen properti yang berkator di KATV Group, Saladin Square B-12, Jl. Margonda Raya No.39, Depok, Jawa Barat. KATV Group adalah group usaha di baah bendera PT Kiprah Tiga Rancang (KITIRAN), dimana core bisnisnya adalah Pengelolaan dan Advertising KATV (Televisi Kabel Kereta Api Eksekutif ), yaitu televisi hiburan bagi penumpang di atas kereta api eksekutif. Selain itu KITIRAN juga bergerak di bidang advertising untuk promosi luar ruang khusus stasiun-stadiuan dan promsoi di dalam kereta eksekutif dan kereta komuter (KRL). Tempat Rumah Impian Termurah Bogor

Tempat Rumah Impian Termurah Bogor salah satu devisi dari KATV Group untuk yang bergerak di bidang agen properti. Saat ini baru menawarkan properti-properti KATV Group yang ada di beberapa kota untuk dijual. Jadi properti yang ditawarkan adalah milik sendiri. Tempat Rumah Impian Termurah Bogor

Tempat Rumah Impian Termurah Bogor

Saco-Indonesia.com - Selama ini minyak ikan diketahui mengandung asam lemak omega-3 yang baik untuk kesehatan jantung dan bisa menangkal penyakit jantung.

Saco-Indonesia.com - Selama ini minyak ikan diketahui mengandung asam lemak omega-3 yang baik untuk kesehatan jantung dan bisa menangkal penyakit jantung. Namun baru-baru ini penelitian mengungkap bahwa hal tersebut tak berlaku untuk suplemen minyak ikan. Orang yang mengonsumsi suplemen minyak ikan kemungkinan tak akan mendapat manfaat kesehatan yang mereka inginkan.

Hasil ini ditemukan peneliti setelah mengamati 17 penelitian yang dikombinasikan dengan penelitian terbaru dalam skala besar. Mereka tak menemukan adanya efek signifikan dari suplemen minyak ikan yang bisa menurunkan risiko penyakit jantung koroner.

Penelitian ini tak menunjukkan adanya penurunan risiko seseorang terkena serangan jantung, stroke, dan gagal jantung pada 1.100 orang yang mengonsumsi suplemen minyak ikan dan omega-3 secara teratur, seperti dilansir oleh Health Day News (17/03).

"Melihat pada 17 penelitian ini, kami tak menemukan adanya penurunan risiko penyakit jantung dan efek signifikan yang bisa diberikan oleh suplemen omega-3 untuk kesehatan," ungkap Dr Rajiv Chowdhury, ketua peneliti.

Meski begitu, peneliti tetap menekankan pentingnya omega-3 bagi kesehatan tubuh dan jantung. Namun harus diperhatikan bahwa omega-3 yang baik untuk kesehatan adalah yang didapatkan melalui makanan alami dan bernutrisi seperti ikan tuna atau salmon, bukan melalui suplemen.

Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya orang mengonsumsi ikan untuk meningkatkan kesehatan jantung dan fungsi otak. Selain itu, masyarakat sebaiknya lebih berhati-hati sebelum mengonsumsi suplemen minyak ikan secara teratur. Jangan sampai membuang uang tanpa mendapatkan manfaat kesehatan yang diinginkan.

Editor : Maulana Lee

Sumber : merdeka.com

Mabit atau bermalam di Muzdalifah memberikan kesempatan kepada jamaah haji untuk beristirahat guna memulihkan tenaga. Kondisi ba

Mabit atau bermalam di Muzdalifah memberikan kesempatan kepada jamaah haji untuk beristirahat guna memulihkan tenaga. Kondisi badan yang fit sangat diperlukan sebab rangkaian kegiatan ibadah haji keesokan harinya sangat berat, yaitu melempar jumrah Aqabah di Mina.

Melempar jumrah adalah simbol perlawanan terhadap setan. Karena melawan setan tidak semudah membalik telapak tangan, kita membutuhkan stamina dan kekuatan yang sangat besar untuk mengalahkannya. Karena itulah, sebelum melaksanakan ibadah apa pun kondisi tubuh kita harus sehat dan kuat.

Hikmah yang bisa kita petik dari kegiatan mabit di Muzdalifah adalah bahwa untuk dapat menjalankan ibadah secara baik kita harus menjaga kondisi fisik agar tetap prima. Karena itu, penulis akan menyediakan ruang tersendiri untuk membahas tentang persiapan apa saja yang harus dilakukan agar kesehatan fisik dan mental tetap terjaga.

Melempar jumrah adalah simbol perlawanan manusia terhadap setan. Manusia harus melakukan perlawanan kepada setan karena mereka selalu berupaya menyesatkan manusia dari jalan kebenaran dan menjauhkan mereka dari jalan Allah SWT. Melempar jumrah adalah simbol keteladanan Hajar yang menunjukkan sikap permu terhadap setan.

Dalam suatu riwayat dikatakan bahwa sewaktu Ibrahim membawa Ismail untuk disembelih, setan membujuk Hajar agar menghentikan langkah suaminya itu. Sebagi seorang ibu, menurut setan, Hajar tidak akan sampai hati mengetahui buah hatinya dikorbankan. Perkiraan setan ternyata meleset. Bukannya menuruti bisikan setan, Hajar malah mengambil batu dan melemparinya berkali-kali.

Dalam ibadah haji, melempar jumrah tidak hanya dilakukan dalam satu hari melainkan tiga atau empat hari. Ini menunjukkan perintah Allah yang sangat tegas agar manusia benar-benar memusuhi setan dan tidak bersekutu dengannya. Panji-panji harus terus dikibarkan dan genderang perang melawan setan harus terus ditabuh.

Allah SWT berfirman, “Sesungguhnya setan adalah musuh bagimu maka jadikanlah ia sebagai musuh(mu). Sesungguhnya setan- setan itu hanya mengajak golongannya agar mereka menjadi penghuni neraka yang menyala-nyala. (QS. Fathir ayat 6).

Orang yang mengharapkan kebahagiaan di dunia dan akhirat harus bisa menyelami sekaligus mempraktikkan makna dan nilai-nilai melempar jumrah, yaitu memusuhi setan hingga kapan pun. Setiap muslim terutama para jamaah haji yang telah pulang dari Tanah Suci harus mencontoh sikap Hajar dalam memerangi setan, sebab hanya dengan cara itulah kita akan sampai pada ridha Allah SWT.


Sumber : http://www.jurnalhaji.com/berita/mabit-di-muzdalifah-melempar-jumrah-di-jamarat/#sthash.ZXv92Khr.dpuf

Baca Artikel Linnya : HIKMAH MELAKSANAKAN HAJI

Imagine an elite professional services firm with a high-performing, workaholic culture. Everyone is expected to turn on a dime to serve a client, travel at a moment’s notice, and be available pretty much every evening and weekend. It can make for a grueling work life, but at the highest levels of accounting, law, investment banking and consulting firms, it is just the way things are.

Except for one dirty little secret: Some of the people ostensibly turning in those 80- or 90-hour workweeks, particularly men, may just be faking it.

Many of them were, at least, at one elite consulting firm studied by Erin Reid, a professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. It’s impossible to know if what she learned at that unidentified consulting firm applies across the world of work more broadly. But her research, published in the academic journal Organization Science, offers a way to understand how the professional world differs between men and women, and some of the ways a hard-charging culture that emphasizes long hours above all can make some companies worse off.

Photo
 
Credit Peter Arkle

Ms. Reid interviewed more than 100 people in the American offices of a global consulting firm and had access to performance reviews and internal human resources documents. At the firm there was a strong culture around long hours and responding to clients promptly.

“When the client needs me to be somewhere, I just have to be there,” said one of the consultants Ms. Reid interviewed. “And if you can’t be there, it’s probably because you’ve got another client meeting at the same time. You know it’s tough to say I can’t be there because my son had a Cub Scout meeting.”

Some people fully embraced this culture and put in the long hours, and they tended to be top performers. Others openly pushed back against it, insisting upon lighter and more flexible work hours, or less travel; they were punished in their performance reviews.

The third group is most interesting. Some 31 percent of the men and 11 percent of the women whose records Ms. Reid examined managed to achieve the benefits of a more moderate work schedule without explicitly asking for it.

They made an effort to line up clients who were local, reducing the need for travel. When they skipped work to spend time with their children or spouse, they didn’t call attention to it. One team on which several members had small children agreed among themselves to cover for one another so that everyone could have more flexible hours.

A male junior manager described working to have repeat consulting engagements with a company near enough to his home that he could take care of it with day trips. “I try to head out by 5, get home at 5:30, have dinner, play with my daughter,” he said, adding that he generally kept weekend work down to two hours of catching up on email.

Despite the limited hours, he said: “I know what clients are expecting. So I deliver above that.” He received a high performance review and a promotion.

What is fascinating about the firm Ms. Reid studied is that these people, who in her terminology were “passing” as workaholics, received performance reviews that were as strong as their hyper-ambitious colleagues. For people who were good at faking it, there was no real damage done by their lighter workloads.

It calls to mind the episode of “Seinfeld” in which George Costanza leaves his car in the parking lot at Yankee Stadium, where he works, and gets a promotion because his boss sees the car and thinks he is getting to work earlier and staying later than anyone else. (The strategy goes awry for him, and is not recommended for any aspiring partners in a consulting firm.)

A second finding is that women, particularly those with young children, were much more likely to request greater flexibility through more formal means, such as returning from maternity leave with an explicitly reduced schedule. Men who requested a paternity leave seemed to be punished come review time, and so may have felt more need to take time to spend with their families through those unofficial methods.

The result of this is easy to see: Those specifically requesting a lighter workload, who were disproportionately women, suffered in their performance reviews; those who took a lighter workload more discreetly didn’t suffer. The maxim of “ask forgiveness, not permission” seemed to apply.

It would be dangerous to extrapolate too much from a study at one firm, but Ms. Reid said in an interview that since publishing a summary of her research in Harvard Business Review she has heard from people in a variety of industries describing the same dynamic.

High-octane professional service firms are that way for a reason, and no one would doubt that insane hours and lots of travel can be necessary if you’re a lawyer on the verge of a big trial, an accountant right before tax day or an investment banker advising on a huge merger.

But the fact that the consultants who quietly lightened their workload did just as well in their performance reviews as those who were truly working 80 or more hours a week suggests that in normal times, heavy workloads may be more about signaling devotion to a firm than really being more productive. The person working 80 hours isn’t necessarily serving clients any better than the person working 50.

In other words, maybe the real problem isn’t men faking greater devotion to their jobs. Maybe it’s that too many companies reward the wrong things, favoring the illusion of extraordinary effort over actual productivity.

WASHINGTON — During a training course on defending against knife attacks, a young Salt Lake City police officer asked a question: “How close can somebody get to me before I’m justified in using deadly force?”

Dennis Tueller, the instructor in that class more than three decades ago, decided to find out. In the fall of 1982, he performed a rudimentary series of tests and concluded that an armed attacker who bolted toward an officer could clear 21 feet in the time it took most officers to draw, aim and fire their weapon.

The next spring, Mr. Tueller published his findings in SWAT magazine and transformed police training in the United States. The “21-foot rule” became dogma. It has been taught in police academies around the country, accepted by courts and cited by officers to justify countless shootings, including recent episodes involving a homeless woodcarver in Seattle and a schizophrenic woman in San Francisco.

Now, amid the largest national debate over policing since the 1991 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles, a small but vocal set of law enforcement officials are calling for a rethinking of the 21-foot rule and other axioms that have emphasized how to use force, not how to avoid it. Several big-city police departments are already re-examining when officers should chase people or draw their guns and when they should back away, wait or try to defuse the situation

Artikel lainnya »