jual condotel mewah

Rp 2.422.000.000

 Menghilangkan Jamur Pada Jaket Kulit Jamur biasanya akan muncul pada jaket kulit jika udara atau tempat sekitar jaket k

 Menghilangkan Jamur Pada Jaket Kulit

Jamur biasanya akan muncul pada jaket kulit jika udara atau tempat sekitar jaket kulit lembab. Paling cepat jamur muncul setelah jaket terkena hujan/air dan langsung disimpan (tanpa di lap/dikeringkan). pada jaket kulit akan timbul bercak putih disekitar daerah kulit yang lembab/basah. Atau apabila jaket sudah lama disimpan dalam kondisi lembab jamur bercak putihnya timbul dengan akan merata, dan agak susah untuk membersihkannya­ hanya dengan di lap saja.

Lalu bagaimana cara mengatasinya?


Pertama,
Siapkan alat serta ramuan berikut :
- busa spoons 2 pcs (buat cuci piring, ada bagian yang lembut dan yang kasarnya)
- lotion khusus kulit (bisa handbody, lotion khusus jaket kulit, atau paling mudah lotion merk ‘kit’ semprot yang buat motor itu)
- satu lagi, siapkan ‘kit magic’yang khusus buat mengkilapkan ban kendaraan (optional aja ini mah)

- Siapkan meja operasi yang cukup


Sekarang kita mulai langkah selanjutnya :

- Bersihkan kotoran atau bercak putih yang menempel pada permukaan kulit dengan sisi busa yang lembut secara merata.

- Jika ada bercak/kotoran yang susah dibersihkan, ambil minyak goreng sedikit, oleskan pada kotoran itu, lalu gosok lagi. Kalau susah juga baru gunakan sisi busa yang kasar untuk menggosoknya. Harus hati-hati.

- Setelah jaket kulit cukup bersih, buang aja busa spoons yang kotor dan ganti dengan yang baru

- Lalu semprotkan lotion khusus kulit pada permukaan jaket dengan rata (bagian depan dulu). Diamkan beberapa saat agar lotionnya menyerap (jangan sampai kering).

- Mulailah menggosok jaketnya secara merata (pake bagian yang lembut). Jika masih ada bercak putih yang masih menempel di permukaan kulit, di gosok aja agak keras dikit.

- Setelah itu, saatnya menyemprot bagian belakang atau punggung jaket dan menggosoknya (sama dengan di atas).

- Setelah seluruh bagian jaket selesai dikerjakan, biarkan beberapa saat sampai kering. Gantung dengan hanger. Kalau cuaca lagi bagus, jemur aja sampai kering, tapi jangan sampai kering benar, secukupnya saja.

- Jika sudah cukup kering, siapkan ‘lotion kit magic-nya’. Semprotkan secara merata pada permukaan kulit. Biarkan beberapa saat agar diserap. Lalu ratakan dengan busa. Lalu jemur lagi sampai cukup kering.

- Lalu jaket kulit gantung dengan hanger, simpan di tempat terbuka.

- Selesai,
Selamat mencoba semoga bermanfaat

  ↵ JASA SEO KAMI BEKERJA SAMA DENGAN ANDA DALAM 4 LANGKAH: 1 CONSULTATION Kami akan berkonsul

  

1
CONSULTATION
Kami akan berkonsultasi dengan Anda untuk mengetahui tujuan dari situs web perusahaan secara keseluruhan dan produk utama yang ditawarkan. Selanjutnya jasa SEO kami akan melakukan audit optimasi situs web Anda untuk mengidentifikasi teknik-teknik khusus yang dapat diterapkan untuk meningkatkan peringkat situs web Anda.
2
IMPLEMENTATION
Jasa SEO kami memperbaiki faktor on-site situs web Anda seperti struktur situs web, title, kode HTML, dan kepadatan kata kunci (keyword density). Kami juga mengoptimasi faktor off-site situs web dengan mencantumkan situs web Anda pada beberapa direktori bisnis terkemuka, dan membangun incoming link yang berkualitas dari situs-situs yang mempunyai otoritas dengan peringkat tinggi dan berkaitan dengan bisnis Anda.
3
MONITORING AND REPORTING
Setelah implementasi, jasa SEO kami terus memonitor peringkat situs web Anda untuk beberapa target kata kunci yang mendatangkan banyak kunjungan. Kami akan mengirimkan kepada Anda detail laporan bulanan tentang kinerja dan performa dari kampanye optimasi mesin pencari yang kita lakukan.
4
CONTINUOUS ADJUSMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS
Kami mengevaluasi efektivitas optimasi yang sedang berlangsung dalam upaya peningkatan jumlah kunjungan dan penjualan pada situs web Anda. Pada tahap ini, Anda dapat melihat potensi optimasi mesin pencari. Kita akan bekerja sama kembali untuk memperbaiki lebih lanjut tentang target kata kunci, dan strategi konten yang akan menjadikan situs web Anda meduduki peringkat yang lebih baik lagi.

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

With 12 tournament victories in his career, Mr. Peete was the most successful black professional golfer before Tiger Woods.

Artikel lainnya »